rdf-syntax-grammar
mods:
  schema location: http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
  title info:
    non sort: A
    title: "soft law" szerepéről egy környezetjogi szabályozási terület példáján keresztül
  name:
    name part: Tahyné Kovács Ágnes
    role:
      role term: creator
  type of resource: text
  origin info:
    place:
      place term: hu
    date issued: 2018
    issuance: continuing
  language:
    language term: zxx
  physical description:
    form: elektronikus dokumentum
    extent: 43-54
  abstract: Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are living organisms whose genetic material has been artificially manipulated in a laboratory through genetic engineering. This creates combinations of plant, animal, bacteria and virus genes that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods. Despite promises from the biotech industry, there is no evidence that any of the GMOs currently on the market offer increased yield, drought tolerance, enhanced nutrition, or any other consumer benefit. Globally, there are 300 regions with outright bans on growing GMOs. In the absence of credible independent long-term feeding studies, the safety of GMOs is unknown. GMOs impact on the environment is significant. The expansion in the production, distribution and consumption of GMOs, has produced discussions about pros and cons concerning their legal regulation. Efforts to regulate genetically modified organisms have taken place at both international and regional levels. At the international level, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, based on the precautionary principle, is one of the first legally binding international agreements to regulate the transboundary transfer of GMOs. The inclusion of the precautionary principle in the GMO controversy has engendered even more debate, especially in the area of the state’s right of decision. This principle relies on anticipatory action in the absence of firm scientific evidence. While this principle has the potential to protect the environment from the uncontrolled spread of GMOS, it has been trapped in an endless debate over its application and compatibility with existings laws. In order to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs, some Member States had recourse to the safeguard clauses and emergency measures pursuant to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 as a result of which, depending on the cases, new or additional information made available since the date of the consent a…
  note: Tahyné Kovács Ágnes
  related item:
    title info:
      title: IUSTUM AEQUUM SALUTARE 14 No. 4
  identifier: 1787-3223
  identifier: https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/332/1/000995168.pdf
  record info:
    record content source: PPKE Publikáció Repozitórium
    record creation date: 240328
    record change date: 20260218144643.0
    record identifier: publ332
    language of cataloging:
      language term: hun