Gondolatok a becsületsértés szabálysértési alakzatáról
No. Bhar.84/2014/3. of the Pécsi Ítélőtábla (Pécs Regional Court of Appeal) inspired the exami-nation on the off ence formation of defamation. Grounds for its decision made a distinction be-tween the off ence and the criminal formations of defamation, based on the extent of the particu-lar defamator...
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Könyv része |
| Megjelent: |
Pázmány Press
Budapest
2020
|
| Sorozat: | A Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Jog- és Államtudományi Karának Könyvei. Doktorandusz Tanulmányok
A sokoldalúság okán : Doktorandusz tanulmányok a Pázmány jogászképzésének 25. tanévében |
| mtmt: | 31806460 |
| Online Access: | https://publikacio.ppke.hu/3105 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | No. Bhar.84/2014/3. of the Pécsi Ítélőtábla (Pécs Regional Court of Appeal) inspired the exami-nation on the off ence formation of defamation. Grounds for its decision made a distinction be-tween the off ence and the criminal formations of defamation, based on the extent of the particu-lar defamatory expression. Consequently, I made the starting point during my research of whether any similar conclusions had occurred in practice apart from that. Substance of the article deals with the possibility of proving the truth as well as with the analysis of the judicial practice. The latter really surprised me since – contrary to my expectations – quite a few defamation cases were brought before courts making it more diffi cult for them to draw conclusions about their decisions. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 12 57-68 |
| ISBN: | 9789633083901 |