|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nab a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
publ2274 |
| 005 |
20250226075222.0 |
| 008 |
250226s2019 hu o 0|| Angol d |
| 022 |
|
|
|a 1744-5523
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1017/S1744552319000272
|2 doi
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 30859727
|2 mtmt
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a PPKE Publikáció Repozitórium
|b hun
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a Angol
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Bor Bettina
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Towards a semiotic theory of style in law
|h [elektronikus dokumentum] :
|b A Peircean approach /
|c Bor Bettina
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2019
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 263-273
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN CONTEXT
|v 15 No. 3
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a This paper discusses the promises and limits of a Peircean semiotic approach to the concept of style in law. It does so in two steps: first (1) by identifying the place of style within the structure of law as a system of signs, then (2) by conceptualising the link between law and style in the thought of C.S. Peirce and highlighting some of the insights from a Peircean take on legal semiotics that may contribute to our understanding of the role of style in making meaning in law. It is argued that, for a Peircean analysis of law, three levels can be distinguished, from the ‘surface structure’ down to the ‘deep structure’. It is at the middle level (that of the ‘basic structure’) that a semiotic approach can yield coherent insights in terms of style, by examining the symbols and metaphors that make for the expressibility of ‘habits’, namely experience-based patterns of action and interpretation.
|
| 700 |
0 |
1 |
|a Könczöl Miklós
|e aut
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/2274/1/Bor_Konczol_Towards_a_semiotic_theory_of_style_in_law.pdf
|z Dokumentum-elérés
|