|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nab a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
publ2067 |
| 005 |
20250401160432.0 |
| 008 |
250127s2024 hu o 0|| Angol d |
| 022 |
|
|
|a 2666-2701
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.5771/9783748946526-371
|2 doi
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 35718740
|2 mtmt
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a PPKE Publikáció Repozitórium
|b hun
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a Angol
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gyeney Laura
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Exception that Proves the Rule?
|h [elektronikus dokumentum] :
|b Schengen and the Reintroduction of Internal Border Controls /
|c Gyeney Laura
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2024
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 371-388
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a HUNGARIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW
|v 12 No. 1
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a The Schengen area is a cornerstone of European integration. In recent years, however, the integrity of the Schengen area has been tested by the migration crisis, terrorism, and, not least, the COVID-19 pandemic. Some Member States have responded to these crises by maintaining border controls beyond the six-month time limit set by the Schengen Borders Code. This study aims to examine whether Member States can invoke public security considerations to reintroduce border controls for a more extended period and whether integration requirements of free movement can be balanced against the security interests of Member States in the Schengen area.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/2067/1/Gyeney_The_Exception_that_Proves_the_Rule.pdf
|z Dokumentum-elérés
|