The Exception that Proves the Rule?

The Schengen area is a cornerstone of European integration. In recent years, however, the integrity of the Schengen area has been tested by the migration crisis, terrorism, and, not least, the COVID-19 pandemic. Some Member States have responded to these crises by maintaining border controls beyond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gyeney Laura
Format: Article
Published: 2024
Series:HUNGARIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW 12 No. 1
mtmt:35718740
Online Access:https://publikacio.ppke.hu/2067

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001 publ2067
005 20250127154546.0
008 250127s2024 hu o 0|| Angol d
022 |a 2666-2701 
024 7 |a 35718740  |2 mtmt 
040 |a PPKE Publikáció Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a Angol 
100 1 |a Gyeney Laura 
245 1 4 |a The Exception that Proves the Rule?  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  Gyeney Laura 
260 |c 2024 
300 |a 371-388 
490 0 |a HUNGARIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW  |v 12 No. 1 
520 3 |a The Schengen area is a cornerstone of European integration. In recent years, however, the integrity of the Schengen area has been tested by the migration crisis, terrorism, and, not least, the COVID-19 pandemic. Some Member States have responded to these crises by maintaining border controls beyond the six-month time limit set by the Schengen Borders Code. This study aims to examine whether Member States can invoke public security considerations to reintroduce border controls for a more extended period and whether integration requirements of free movement can be balanced against the security interests of Member States in the Schengen area. 
856 4 0 |u https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/2067/1/Gyeney_The_Exception_that_Proves_the_Rule.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés